tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240956280446945342024-02-20T22:24:54.536+05:30Ashutosh RaghuwanshiNeural Processor - I am a tiny neuron in the brain of the universe, trying to understand and capture its beauty.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-18204310689660725042012-11-15T15:17:00.001+05:302015-10-12T13:19:32.373+05:30How scientific are scriptures?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<b id="internal-source-marker_0.07950137229636312" style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Many people believe that ancient scriptures have answers to all questions. Some times they show some quotes from those books and try to prove that modern scientific theories are being </span></b><b id="internal-source-marker_0.07950137229636312" style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">indicated by those text. Sometimes the logic is so much convincing that we start feeling if ancient people really had such technology.</span></b><br />
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></b>
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">To understand it better, first think about this question. Do you think that Orion (the constellation) was drawn on the sky? No! It is just countless random stars and we see a pattern in them because we want to see it.</span></b><br />
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Then there is a fact that most of the science starts with hypotheses then it is logically associated with proven concepts (theorised). Later with solid evidences it can become a scientific statement.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">What we find in ancient scriptures (like Vedas), are either patterns that we want to see or the hypotheses. It is said that these hypotheses were invented through meditation. Even scientists make hypotheses by meditation (remember benzene structure was found in dream).</span></b><br />
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></b>
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">But there is a big difference here. Not all the text of scriptures was practically implemented. Whatever was implemented is widely known already for example Ayurveda, Yoga and parts of many other scientific discoveries. For example some less known text like Sushrut Sanhita which was practically used in ancient times. Apart from few such texts most of it is hypotheses and can not be considered as science until we may verify it with experimental facts.</span></b></div>
Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-90925402434884862682012-04-09T07:08:00.000+05:302013-04-25T13:20:38.574+05:30Half truth and science.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
I feel there is a mistake it in our education system. Even at college level, we do not know the full scientific method; neither in theory nor in practical. Even though we have labs we never come to know the application of these scientific terms in our day-to-day life. So they only become terms without specific meanings for us. That is why religious or commercial organisations use such terms to attract people.<br />
<br />
Do you know what does Active Salt mean? Colgate knows that! Do you know what is American Lumino-Peptide? Emami knows that! Pantene Shampoo has Pro-Vitamin B5. Here is a quote from there site:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"The key behind the efficacy of all Pantene products lies in Pro-Vitamin B5, otherwise known as Panthenol" - <a href="http://www.pantene.in/en-IN/about.jsp">http://www.pantene.in/en-IN/about.jsp</a></blockquote>
<br />
What kind of vitamin can be taken directly by hairs? On top of that the meaning of vitamin B5 is also interesting:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantothenic_acid" target="_blank">Pantothenic acid (Vitamin B5)</a> - "Its name derives from the Greek pantothen (πάντοθεν) meaning "from everywhere" and small quantities of pantothenic acid are found in nearly every food."</blockquote>
Why are we paying for something which comes free with our daily food, because our curiosity is lost with the achievement of our degrees. The names of the products given above are just samples and I have no intenssion to target any specific company but what I want to indicate is everybody is using the fact that most of the people knows only the scientific terms and trust them without knowing the meaning.<br />
<br />
I wish we could spread the science in place of religions so that people could use their logical thought process instead of blind faith.</div>
Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-37235800804236022742012-03-21T13:32:00.001+05:302012-03-21T13:33:19.203+05:30Recursive religious behaviour.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Religious people who believe in God, tend to leave there problem to God without analysing them in depth. This lack of analysis lead to baseless fear from the problems which could be easily solved, or in some cases not problems at all. This fear blocks the analytical power of the person and forces him to take refuge in God's belief.<br />
<br />
Now since most of the problems are easy or not problem at all they get resolved with little or no effort and the credit goes to the God. Every time the credit for solving any problem goes to the God, the belief gets stronger and now even if they suffer from some problems they blame themselves for their sins but keep believing in God.<br />
<br />
The more they believe, the more they turn towards the God when they encounter any problem in their life. This cycle goes on and on until you take charge and start analysing things and try to solve them yourself instead of going and asking help from the God.</div>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-72587227630245365402012-03-07T11:32:00.000+05:302012-03-07T11:48:25.251+05:30A hypothesis on elementary particles.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMWxCFWNNwhU1i5VkvF5WfxUuwqrLW1tzfeaht1m8n4p7ZKvUd2jqjSRCBGIfotUvb6ngZ-NABkY7YqHtlwHnN6WRZKfTL0e7nKV-CdL4UahI0j7E-2vy3uMGcRkDZYB3FsKUnbpYS_sE/s1600/17-Bubble-Brushes.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMWxCFWNNwhU1i5VkvF5WfxUuwqrLW1tzfeaht1m8n4p7ZKvUd2jqjSRCBGIfotUvb6ngZ-NABkY7YqHtlwHnN6WRZKfTL0e7nKV-CdL4UahI0j7E-2vy3uMGcRkDZYB3FsKUnbpYS_sE/s320/17-Bubble-Brushes.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
I think elementary particles are like bubbles in the space. If you keep shooting them with higher and higher energies, they will keep breaking into smaller and smaller particles.<br />
<br />
Still no mass will be found because as I have stated <a href="http://ashutosh.raghuwanshi.in/2003/12/higgs-boson.html">earlier</a> that mass is nothing but space taken by these bubbles (particles).<br />
<br />
May be neutron stars and black holes are nothing but a giant unified bubbles where as other objects like stars and planets are only a big bunch of small bubbles.<br />
<br />
I still need to learn a lot before I could theorise any of these hypothesis but I believe this can answer many unanswered questions.</div>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-62228165182575166712011-11-23T03:23:00.001+05:302014-02-11T12:06:43.981+05:30Faster than light!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For most of the physicists, it is hard to conceive the idea of anything being faster than light. The problem lies in the rejection of the need for a medium for light to travel. Einstein thought that any medium would eventually slow the light down. Einstein could not conceive and idea of medium which is not a physical matter.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He said that space has curves in General Theory of Relativity but he never tried to join his special theory of relativity with it. If space can have curves then it can also have density. And if you consider the space as the medium of light then any change in the density of space will change the speed of light too.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is in response to:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/20/us-science-neutrinos-idUSTRE7AJ0ZX20111120" style="text-align: left;" target="_blank">Study rejects "faster than light" particle finding</a></div>
</div>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-40080305564210371392011-09-24T16:05:00.003+05:302011-09-24T16:05:37.522+05:30Why light is (was) the fastest one?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
Whatever we observe in the universe is through electromagnetic waves. That is the reason why,whatever moves faster than light can not (or real hard to) be observed. Till now there were many phenomenon in QED which were explained based on events happening backward in time. I believe that all those are nothing but particles moving faster than light. That is why we observe the outcome of the event before we could observe the start of the event itself. I always feel that we should keep it simple.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://toi.in/PkvcgZ">TOI: Roll over Einstein: Pillar of physics challenged</a></div>
</div>
Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-58035687093191438282011-09-11T01:03:00.001+05:302015-11-27T12:30:37.333+05:30Last Day at IIM Calcutta<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
Inspite of happiness of completion of CPMSD-05, we can see the pain of fairwell in many of the participants. Before going to sleep I wanted to put these photographs as a memento of this time.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdn4Q8lsuowlGWSx_lxXyKdwPtu-BDUaCzqK67FqzuFoaKfCbF6iS9Z0OF9JZjXmCiGzwPkkURf0TErFJb0ffW2_FNJyDbfg4GrharXcAOu6GJIcsp6g0Eq63rrAtJ4OMtT6UWdeyr_aU/s1600/2011-09-10+14.32.15.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="385" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdn4Q8lsuowlGWSx_lxXyKdwPtu-BDUaCzqK67FqzuFoaKfCbF6iS9Z0OF9JZjXmCiGzwPkkURf0TErFJb0ffW2_FNJyDbfg4GrharXcAOu6GJIcsp6g0Eq63rrAtJ4OMtT6UWdeyr_aU/s640/2011-09-10+14.32.15.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgee59D4jeT584DozWHSc8aw1fYsccpHzLgf8VLnpnrG1Ylrc0KYpD9rYq5w8oP9ZJfcVk6vUpM3mkKv4MMFYz9ovydvfid9SzFffKIP5FIm4BCQMi-Mc-SgrpGMkZ6-lsa5G7-PmC4xEY/s1600/2011-09-10+19.39.57.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="386" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgee59D4jeT584DozWHSc8aw1fYsccpHzLgf8VLnpnrG1Ylrc0KYpD9rYq5w8oP9ZJfcVk6vUpM3mkKv4MMFYz9ovydvfid9SzFffKIP5FIm4BCQMi-Mc-SgrpGMkZ6-lsa5G7-PmC4xEY/s640/2011-09-10+19.39.57.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5ogMm8yMKpIRsj-C3qjAPrQkupordqIj7gNHFQ-4ksdBxiNtlvj6hJ5Pd-1b05i25kIVH4tNw-OyA1H33bEhCbUvzJg92D_F-yH6Ty5-TwVjMPdb0_81ZoovqmaXl7zI7liXttDG7UWc/s1600/2011-09-10+23.19.24.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="386" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5ogMm8yMKpIRsj-C3qjAPrQkupordqIj7gNHFQ-4ksdBxiNtlvj6hJ5Pd-1b05i25kIVH4tNw-OyA1H33bEhCbUvzJg92D_F-yH6Ty5-TwVjMPdb0_81ZoovqmaXl7zI7liXttDG7UWc/s640/2011-09-10+23.19.24.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
For the rest of the pictures, please visit <a href="https://goo.gl/photos/XUA969mRF7BCHtTk9" target="_blank">this album</a>.</div>
</div>
Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Pailan, Kolkata, West Bengal, India22.444023 88.30199tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-50610187879209728152010-09-24T05:40:00.006+05:302011-05-05T13:37:39.917+05:30Theories that need to be unified.Space can unify many theories but to accomplish that we need to understand that space is not void.<br />
<br />
There are many theories and facts which seem to be different but really very tightly connected. I am enlisting them here for future reference:<br />
<ol><li>Light is affected by the geometry of space (gravity).</li>
<li>Gravity is proportional to the mass of the matter.</li>
<li>Mass is an unknown property. We are only expecting the Higgs to be found at LHC. But, if I am not going in wrong direction then we will never find Higgs. See: <a href="/2003/12/higgs-boson.html">Higgs Boson</a></li>
</ol><a name='more'></a>Now let us have a look at another fact. These are the entities which can pass through an absolute vacuum:<br />
<ol><li>Magnetic Flux</li>
<li>Electric Flux</li>
<li>Light</li>
<li>Gravity</li>
</ol>First three are already unified under Electromagnetism, fourth is known to be affected by geometry of space. This is nothing but a great clue that space is not void but something that needs to be studied because it has the key to unification of all these theories:<br />
<ol><li>Electromagnetic propagation</li>
<li>The source of mass in matter</li>
<li>Quantum Field Theory (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect">Casimir Effect</a>)</li>
<li>Acceleration in the expansion of the universe. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter">Dark Matter</a>/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy">Dark Energy</a>)</li>
</ol>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-15959498210367579372010-09-17T16:43:00.003+05:302010-09-18T13:19:03.727+05:30A not so widely known fact about 'Space'Any volume of space containing <b>no particle</b> of matter, is still not empty. Even the absolute vacuum has a pressure measure of zero but in universe there are places which have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy#Negative_pressure">negative pressure</a>.<br />
<br />
This proves that even when there is no matter available, we can not call it empty and thus space is not empty but filled with something which is the origin (zero) of the frame of reference for all the matter (not for dark matter). This is why we think that space is empty while the reality is that, it is not.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-48503922963816882792010-01-11T17:35:00.001+05:302010-09-18T13:34:12.729+05:30Space vs SpaceCan we be sure that the space inside atom (between electrons and nucleus) and the space outside the atom has same characteristics? My hypothesis is that the space has something which helps electromagnetism work. But electrons makes a kind of shield around nucleus which disables the electromagnetic effects inside the atom.<br />
<br />
This can explain why positively charges protons never repulse.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-24443262813413832192009-12-31T13:31:00.000+05:302009-12-31T13:31:30.823+05:30Medium of LightThere is no luminiferous aether but that doesn't mean that space is empty. It is made up something which provides medium to light. Einstein says any such things would slow down the light. Yes it is slowing down the light that is why light is limited to 3,00,000 Km/s.<br />
<br />
Speed of a wave depends on the properties of its medium. Space is determining the speed of light and thus the scale of time that is why there is a sequence of events in the universe. In the absence of this limit to the speed of light, all events would have happened instantaneously.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-75277496535690510652009-12-11T22:39:00.002+05:302010-09-18T13:33:25.150+05:30Mass Space EquivalenceLet's take a hypothetical modal of the universe. In this modal we have two analogies:<br />
<ol><li>Water is analogous to the space in real world.</li>
<li>Bubbles of water vapor analogous to the matter in the real world.</li>
</ol>Now when water vapor will change into water; only the energy, being released; will be measurable because we have no way to measure space(water in this case). Nobody will say that water vapor (matter) is converting into water (space). People will say that water vapor (matter) is converting into energy.<br />
<br />
Now let's talk about the real world. Same as the above example, the space is intangible to us, so when mass converts into space; we only see the energy getting released and thus we say that mass is convertible into energy.<br />
<br />
Currently this is only my hypothesis, I want to research on this, if I could get a chance.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-17819889551964385102009-12-06T21:08:00.004+05:302009-12-07T00:14:03.150+05:30Relativity of SpacePerfect vacuum is just the origin of our reference frame of space. It is not the absolute zero. It means that space can be negative too. At least to some extent if not to the negative infinitive.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-5472588698164944612009-03-20T16:45:00.009+05:302009-03-20T17:03:59.904+05:30Global Variables aka ProstitutesGlobal variables are like unprotected free prostitutes. They are accessible to all. Just one mistake by someone can become a very simple reason for spreading diseases (bugs).<br /><br />Be domestic and use only local (or parameters) variables or the once encapsulated by well behaved objects.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-11522666373229801782008-01-15T00:00:00.006+05:302009-12-15T19:13:33.043+05:30My BeliefI am not a religious person I don't listen to the Gods. I listen to my brain may be sometimes my heart but I can never be a blind disciple.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-25653854389637867162007-11-07T02:22:00.001+05:302009-12-16T02:36:38.222+05:30Security by ObscuritySecurity of proprietary systems is sometimes the security by obscurity, which is in deed not real security. It is just like a treasure hidden inside a maze. It is hard to find but not too hard.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-68883757086151164472007-08-12T08:54:00.001+05:302008-09-30T21:43:40.832+05:30Individuality<p>It might be next to impossible but not impossible to loose one's individuality. Actually it is our individuality which saparate us from The God.</p><p>Use of "The Soul of the Universe", to indicate the God, was really the beauty of the book, "The Alchemist". It actually says that God is no saparate thing. God is the soul of the universe and we are the a part of it. The misery is that we never try to feel that we can mingle in the soul of the universe to become the God itself.</p><p>The shepherd of The Alchemist did that and thus he could control the nature because he mingled with the soul of the world. As our soul controls our body, soul of the world controls the world.</p><p>So! When you loose your individuality you can control the universe but then you no more remain just a human being.</p>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-77348262571734927142007-07-14T21:08:00.000+05:302007-07-14T21:09:57.337+05:30EgoUniverse is too big for even the imagination. But still human ego sometimes beat it.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-90381249811175802032007-07-11T17:55:00.000+05:302007-07-11T17:59:42.919+05:30Jaane Kyuu... Aisa Lagta Hai...Jaane Kyuu... Aisa Lagta Hai... Jaise aasmaan gulabi ho gaya hai... aur sunahre baadalon se bikharti moti si boondon ne dharti ka daaman hara kar diya hai...<br /><br />Jaane Kyuu... Aisa Lagta Hai... Jaise tum kisi jhurmut ke peeghe se mujhe dekh rahi ho... Aur man hi man meri vikalta par muskura rahi ho...<br /><br />Jaane Kyuu... Aisa Lagta Hai... Mujhe kuchh mil gaya hai... ye saara sansaar... ab koi prateeksha nahin rahi kyonki ye maarg hi mera gantavya ban gaya hai...<br /><br />Jaane Kyuu... Aisa Lagta Hai... Jaise sabkuchh to tha mere paas... jo nahin hai wo ane wala hai... aur jo hai wo kahin chhoot jane ko hai... fir maine kyon bhatkun... kyon ashant sa vicharta rahun jabki mere paas to saara sansaar hai.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-24557511858344976722007-07-11T03:17:00.001+05:302009-12-15T23:36:23.230+05:30Parashuram killed his real mother!<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">Parashuram</span> killed his real mother and then mow down the whole <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Hehey</span> dynasty. After several years later at the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Dhanush</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Yagya</span>, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Shree</span> Ram himself praised <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Parashuram</span>.<br />
<br />
Now what I want to discuss is whether we should blindly fallow our parents or we should give them a lesson too, if they need it?<br />
<br />
I think if only being elder has been a proof of being correct then we would have still living in the stone age. Elders have experience and that can be a advantage sometimes but not always. You might have heard the proverb "<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Doodh</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">ka</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">jala</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">chhach</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">ko</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">bhi</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">foonk</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">kar</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">peeta</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">hai</span>". Many times bad experience make us a coward and stop us to experiment with life which can give us a positive direction too.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-68780087421054126892007-06-28T13:36:00.008+05:302009-12-15T20:12:03.918+05:30Love marriage or arranged marriage?I have seen this question in many communities and all the time posted by some girl. Why?<br />
<br />
Actually these girls want to choose their life partners themselves because they are self dependent they take all decisions themselves but the way parents have given them the teachings they are always in doubt so they always try to reassure themselves that arrange marriage is better.<br />
<br />
I think neither love marriage nor arrange marriage is good. There should be another type of marriage that is "sync marriage" marry someone whom you know and with whom you feel the most comfortable. Love can be and illusion created by attraction or infatuation. Arrange marriage is a lottery. So! Both can fail while understanding can never fail.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-82760791040505410782007-03-30T00:00:00.013+05:302009-12-15T19:23:16.882+05:30Deities, Incarnations and The GodThere is a huge difference between The God, Incarnations and deities like Gayatri maa. Let's understand them one by one backwards.<br />
<br />
Deities:<br />
Deities like Gayatri are nothing but the representation of some set of philosophies. Gayatri is basically the name of a 'Chhand' (type of verse form). The deity Gayatri is the sculptural or pictorial representation of the philosophies explained by the Gayatri Mantras.<br />
<br />
Incarnations:<br />
When someone embodies a deity into his or her life then the person or the people are called the incarnation of that deity. This is one of the reason that most of the incarnation are the form of Vishnu. There are few incarnation of Mahakaal but as much as my limited knowledge say, there is no incarnation of Brhma. One can operate the world, one can also distruct it to some extent but none can generate. Things can be converted to other forms only. No construction or absolute destruction is possible that is why there is no incarnation of Brahma.<br />
<br />
The God:<br />
The God is beyond any definition that is why Hrigveda didn't even name it. I don't have the book at this time and I don't want to quote that 'Hricha' with spelling mistakes to I am just stating the meaning of it. It says about many properties of the God and then askes "Kasmai Devay Havishavidhem" (Which such deity we should worship). It also has the answer in itself "Kah asmai Devay Havishavidhem" ('Kah' such deity we should worship). In the vedic era 'Kah' was used in algebra similar to the 'X' now a days.<br />
<br />
So! Indirectly Hrigveda says that we just know a part of the God. None can explain you about the God even if it become known.Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-83462723208649424012003-12-05T00:00:00.005+05:302010-09-24T04:59:32.178+05:30Higgs BosonMass is nothing but the space taken by the fundamental particles. So! there is no need to introduce another type of boson (Higgs Boson).Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124095628044694534.post-45364940146471389642003-01-01T00:00:00.009+05:302009-12-15T19:42:28.382+05:30Rules for Married Life<ol><li>Never shout on each other solve the problem by discursion otherwise break up but no quarrel like animals.</li>
<li>To err is human so don't consider the partner as more than a human try to understand his/her problem by putting yourself at his/her place.</li>
<li>Don't be possessive! Only be requesting. Remember! Not being oppressive does not mean being submissive.</li>
<li>Don't expect anything from your spouse. If you want to be independent just don't depend on him/her for your work. Do it yourself. ;-)</li>
<li>If something in your spouse annoys you then instead of getting irritated think logically about whom between you two, must change. If logic says that your spouse must change then tell it to him/her peacefully in a calm environment. Also help him/her in the process of changing.</li>
</ol>Ashutosh Raghuwanshihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08208837821977587436noreply@blogger.com0