Showing posts with label mass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mass. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

A hypothesis on elementary particles.

I think elementary particles are like bubbles in the space. If you keep shooting them with higher and higher energies, they will keep breaking into smaller and smaller particles.

Still no mass will be found because as I have stated earlier that mass is nothing but space taken by these bubbles (particles).

May be neutron stars and black holes are nothing but a giant unified bubbles where as other objects like stars and planets are only a big bunch of small bubbles.

I still need to learn a lot before I could theorise any of these hypothesis but I believe this can answer many unanswered questions.

Friday, September 24, 2010

Theories that need to be unified.

Space can unify many theories but to accomplish that we need to understand that space is not void.

There are many theories and facts which seem to be different but really very tightly connected. I am enlisting them here for future reference:
  1. Light is affected by the geometry of space (gravity).
  2. Gravity is proportional to the mass of the matter.
  3. Mass is an unknown property. We are only expecting the Higgs to be found at LHC. But, if I am not going in wrong direction then we will never find Higgs. See: Higgs Boson

Friday, September 17, 2010

A not so widely known fact about 'Space'

Any volume of space containing no particle of matter, is still not empty. Even the absolute vacuum has a pressure measure of zero but in universe there are places which have negative pressure.

This proves that even when there is no matter available, we can not call it empty and thus space is not empty but filled with something which is the origin (zero) of the frame of reference for all the matter (not for dark matter). This is why we think that space is empty while the reality is that, it is not.

Friday, December 11, 2009

Mass Space Equivalence

Let's take a hypothetical modal of the universe. In this modal we have two analogies:
  1. Water is analogous to the space in real world.
  2. Bubbles of water vapor analogous to the matter in the real world.
Now when water vapor will change into water; only the energy, being released; will be measurable because we have no way to measure space(water in this case). Nobody will say that water vapor (matter) is converting into water (space). People will say that water vapor (matter) is converting into energy.

Now let's talk about the real world. Same as the above example, the space is intangible to us, so when mass converts into space; we only see the energy getting released and thus we say that mass is convertible into energy.

Currently this is only my hypothesis, I want to research on this, if I could get a chance.

Friday, December 5, 2003

Higgs Boson

Mass is nothing but the space taken by the fundamental particles. So! there is no need to introduce another type of boson (Higgs Boson).